|Not as extreme as he looks|
A near Orwellian police state with bans on weapons, bans on words and thoughts, and an incessant flow of PC propaganda is no defence against the insanities created by “multicultural Britain.” We saw this yet again in London, where we were recently ‘treated’ to an iPhone clip of a Sub-Saharan Muslim lecturing us, his hands freshly crimsoned with the blood of an off-duty British soldier that he and an associate had just slaughtered on the streets of Woolwich in South East London.
The basic problem here is not the nature of Sub-Saharan Africans or the nature of Islam. These have been well-known for a long time and are what they are for a variety of reasons that it is superfluous to go into here. No, the real problem is one of politics and ideology, and, in short, of the systemic dislocation of the political spectrum.
In the wake of such horror, we can expect to hear the usual cries for “tolerance” and the throb-in-the-throat pleas not to let the “extremists” win by becoming "hateful" ourselves. But the trouble is the real extremists won long ago. What other word can you use for political parties like the Conservative and Labour Parties that have been creating cultural chaos and enacting genocide and race replacement on a massive scale?
The real extremists are those holding the reins of government, as they have been doing for the last 60 years. But they would have you believe that they are the “moderates,” the reasonable ones, and that the extremists are the "unrepresentative" Muslims who committed the Woolwich atrocity and the "Far Right" parties and organizations that have opposed mass immigration and the kind of multiracialism that has Sub-Saharan Muslims living cheek-by-slashed-jowl with troops serving the interests of America and Israel.
Lets be very clear here: the Muslims who committed this atrocity are not extremists. They are following one of the broadest roads in a major world religion, a religion that grew up among a band of desert cutthroats and expanded by conquest, violence, intimidation, slavery, and mass rape; a religion that tolerates nothing but itself and drives its more logical adherents to acts of violence.
A so-called "moderate" Muslim is nothing more than a bad Muslim, someone who probably drinks alcohol and eats pork as well. A good Muslim is one who acts within the genocidal dictates of the religion’s founder. Needless to say, the rest of us should avoid good Muslims like the plague and be wary of bad Muslims in case they start taking their religion seriously.
The so-called “racists” and “fascists” who oppose multiracial Britain and wish not only to stop mass immigration but also to start the necessary process of "exigration" – the removal of the unassimilatable immigrant population – are not the extremists either. These people are common sense moderates, who, despite the lies of their higher and betters and the endless extremist propaganda of the “multicultural” state, realized at some gut level that the ruling elites were creating a madhouse.
|Jimmy Savile, the infamous paedophile, with |
one of Britain's extremist prime ministers.
The extremists are the media, the BBC and the newspapers of the oligarchs, who have bandied about the word "racist" in an attempt to suppress any opposition to the Third World colonization of Britain, in effect creating a society whose every second thought is now race.
The extremists are the academics, who have used their intelligence to blind themselves for the pleasures of sneering at lowly common sense and basking in the glow of a false moral smugness, while furthering their lie-driven careers.
But the extremists are also the majority of the British people who have voted for these politicians, listened to these journalists, and respected these academics, all the while feeling that something was deeply wrong. To be out of touch with your true feelings and interests is an act of extremism.
Extremism viewed neutrally
Things like the increasing imposition of multicultural totalitarianism and the Woolwich atrocity that it pathetically failed to stop are not accidents. They are the symptoms of a deep disease of the political system. But it is not extremism per se that is the problem. Extremism exists naturally at the extreme ends of any system. Think of it like a bell curve. The left and right sides of the curve – the ‘extremes’ – taper to nothing, while the centre bulges to the highest point and contains most of the mass.
The fact that extremes exist in any system is not a problem in itself, and, in the grand scheme of things, may even be necessary. The problem we have in the West, however, is that “the bulge” – with all its conformism – has been dislocated so that now the weight of opinion and power has been dislocated to the extreme Left for the last 60 years.
"Extreme" and "extremist" are instead used as pejoratives and means for limiting correction back to the center. But what is remotely "extremist" about the wish to prevent your country being colonized and your race sunk in a flood of Third World immigration, degradation, and animalistic violence? This is self evidently a centric notion, but in today’s insane world this is given the name "far-right," "fascist," or "racist," other words signifying "extremism," which has become debased into a mere synonym of "evil."
The Great Displacement
Sensible common sense, the traditional outlook of the vast majority, is now regarded as right-wing extremism. But what has caused this dislocation of the political spectrum? The causes are many, but essentially it is the switch from a society characterized by structure, ties, and values to one based on fluidity, nexus, and price. This shift requires a change in the basic concept of humanity from a static notion based on essence and being to a dynamic notion based on function and interaction: algebra instead of numbers, synapses instead of neurons (and therefore dementia).
This results in the cult of “androidism,” where anything man-shaped is considered equivalent and connected to every other thing that is man-like, with the ability to acquire money the only distinguisher.
|The cult of androidism cannot exist without |
a consciousness of what it is destroying.
The extremists who control the West see androidism as a means to facilitate short-term economic interests – their own and also that of the wider society (hence the widespread support for this stupidity) – but they also see it as a solution to the problems that it creates. Not only does androidism broaden markets, enlarge the labour pool, and create marketable stresses and problems, but it also promises the solution to the chaos it unleashes in the vast reprogramming of the human race.
Be the subjects Sub-Saharans with markedly lower IQs or Muslims with a deeply incompatible culture, the androidist extremists who control the West believe that they can use "education" (the most inefficient sector of the economy) and "culture" (the most despised aspect of modernity) to maintain the status quo in their vast game of demographic musical chairs. Sub-Saharans can be educated to replace hard-working and therefore low-breeding Europeans, and Muslims can be culturally reprogrammed by the potency and insidiousness of Western non-culture.
In this view, the great multiracial cities of West are educational laboratories doing what has never been done before, or vast deculturing concentration camps, exterminating the awkward culture of the incomers in a flood of porn, feminism, consumerism, individualism, and sheer godlessness.
Credit where it’s due: This is a titanic theory and astounding in its scope – if it works. But the great flaw with extreme ideas is that they are extreme for a reason, and this reason is their more tenuous connection with reality. This is how you know they are extreme. This is the case with androidism. Just because someone has two arms and two legs, and walks upright, doesn’t mean that he is equivalent to all the other two-armed and two-legged creatures walking upright. The atrocity in Woolwich is what happens when a society is built on such flawed foundations.
Audio version available here.