Wednesday, 24 May 2017

NAMELESS PODCAST: 'WHITE SHARIA' IS FOR WIMPS


As the West reels from the latest major act of Muslim terror in its midst (this time in Manchester, England)--Andy Nowicki "Namelessly" reveals--on a not totally unrelated note-- that he finds the notion of 'white sharia' quite ignoble as a political philosophy, though not for the reasons you might expect.

16 comments:

  1. "Why isn't anyone else getting this?"

    Because you don't get it. White Sharia is essentially a return to the primal state of man, which is maim, kill, rape and take.

    It has nothing to do with women. It is about men being what men actually are underneath all the facade and veneer of gentleness. that's why the center cannot hold.

    What you call self-actualization/individualism is a luxury of civilization - a decaying civilization.

    And if you still don't get it then consider the following post.

    http://new1.fjcdn.com/pictures/4chan_9546ce_327436.jpg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That wasn't the "this" I was referring to. I "get" the argument you make here perfectly, and I "get" how it feels cool and macho to be a badass shitposter advocating rape, etc.

      Delete
    2. Anglin never advocated rape. You really shouldn't libel people like that. He's said that women are naturally incapable of rational decision-making, and that that role should be left to men. Which is also what the New Testament says at Ephesians 5:22.

      Was St. Paul a "badass shitposter advocating rape," Nowickigger?

      Delete
    3. Just as well he's not advocating rape as those Filipino girls would beat the shit out of that little manlet.

      Delete
  2. The "this" you were referring to was that shitposting is about attracting women.

    It's not. It's about attracting like-minded men.

    Also, it's not about feeling cool and macho. It's about not caring about egalitarian assumptions. It's about overcoming an old, obsolete judeo-christian morality, which you seem to still cling to.

    If you think this is about being cool and macho then you don't get it at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shitposting is about trying to impress others by projecting a "cool," macho online persona wherein jokes about rape, murder, genocide, etc. are de rigeur... "White sharia" is ostensibly about making white men desirable to white women again by having them become unrepentant rapists, murderers, and practitioners of genocide, which (again ostensibly) is what women "really want" from men, despite their claims to the contrary (hence their current attraction to the more savagely-behaved contemporary non-white men).

      The "this" to which I was referring was the simple question, which I haven't seen posed elsewhere: Even if this is what women want, why is it incumbent on men to *give* women what they want?

      Delete
    2. "Even if this is what women want, why is it incumbent on men to *give* women what they want?"

      For the sake of argument, let's say that your potrayal of White Sharia is correct. The answer is simple.

      Violence is truthful.

      If white men do become more violent than Muslims and Blacks (and then either exterminates them or expels them) and start enslaving white women, how white women feel about the whole thing becomes irrelevant, because they have no power to object.

      Thus, what women want become completely irrelevant at this point.

      Delete
    3. ""White sharia" is ostensibly about making white men desirable to white women again"

      No, it isn't. It's about Ephesians 5:22. It's about the normal relationship between men and woman in every single society on Earth except post 1960's Western Whites.

      Sexual dimorphism and divergent sexual roles is an advanced biological adaptation that is found universally among mammals, and less so among plants, bacteria, etc.

      The way to achieve peace is not to encourage an endless power struggle between husband and wife. How many corporations have two CEOs with equal power? None. In order to actually have peace, which of course all civilized people love and desire, you have to have one single person who has the final say. That's not to say he can't consult, and it's not to say he's always right. But unless you want eternal strife, you have to have a final decision maker.

      One thing you learn in the military is that it is usually better for your forces to be united in attacking an unimportant target, than to have them split between an important and unimportant target. In the former case you will win, although that victory may not be optimal, but in the latter case you may well lose, although some were "right" in defying their leadership.

      Delete
  3. "Shitposting is about trying to impress others by projecting a "cool," macho online persona wherein jokes about rape, murder, genocide, etc. are de rigeur..."

    Wrong. People shitpost because it's fun. That's it. There's no deeper meaning to it.

    The whole concept of shitposting originated on anonymous imageboards (4chan and 8chan), where everyone is anonymous and any attempt at distinctiveness is considered as namefaggotry.

    ""White sharia" is ostensibly about making white men desirable to white women again by having them become unrepentant rapists, murderers, and practitioners of genocide, which (again ostensibly) is what women "really want" from men, despite their claims to the contrary (hence their current attraction to the more savagely-behaved contemporary non-white men).

    The "this" to which I was referring was the simple question, which I haven't seen posed elsewhere: Even if this is what women want, why is it incumbent on men to *give* women what they want?"

    This isn't about women. This is about men signalling to like-minded men. Attraction to women is a side effect.

    Consider the following. When gangbangers advertise their various activities, is it because they want to attract the 'honies' or is it because they want to signal to other gangs that they will murder them if they attempt to infringe on their turf?

    The same is true for competing civilizations.

    So let me repeat the point, this has nothing to do with women. This is about men signalling to other men about outside threats.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Of course shitposting is fun. I was addressing the subject of WHY it is fun, and what MAKES it fun. Saying that "there's no deeper meaning to it" is missing the point. I never claimed that it was deep.

    "Attraction to women is a side effect." In this article at Daily Stormer, Anglin certainly seems to be saying that it's about women. Do you dispute his take on "white sharia"? https://www.dailystormer.com/white-sharia-why-we-dont-have-any-choice/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Do you dispute his take on "white sharia"?"

      No. Nothing he said would have been controversial in the least before 1960, or, ok, maybe 1860.

      If you think women are rational decision makers when it comes to voting or anything else.... well, de-Jew yourself.

      Delete
    2. If your take on white sharia is the same as Anglin's, then you're saying that it IS about about white men becoming savage and dominating in order to make themselves desirable to white women again and thus prevent white women from miscegenating. That is pretty much the entirety of his argument, as shown in the link I provided.

      In which case, it IS indeed about white men changing themselves to earn the approval and esteem of white women, since women (according to Anglin) want to be savaged and dominated .

      Delete
  5. You have to be a weak, sexually frustrated, sand-wigger for advocating something like "White Sharia." If you want to pretend you're a "bad-ass" and signal to other insecure men how "bad-ass" you are, just convert to Islam and you can rape, murder and steal all you want in the name of Allah.

    I support the Christian Patriarchy because I'm a White Christian man and I don't hate women. They can be frustrating and drive you crazy, but I get what I want from them, so I have no reason to complain.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If this was in Iran or Saudi Arabia- two Sharia countries- Andrew Anglin would already have been put in jail. and beaten within an inch of his life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And so also with the Alt-right buddy, Roosh

      Delete
    2. Not that long ago in the USA the same would have happened. and they would not have been protected by the cops.

      Delete

REPORT: NATIONAL-ANARCHIST MOVEMENT CONFERENCE (DAY ONE)

by Keith Preston Special thanks to Peter Topfer, Adam Ormes, Thom Forester, and Sean Jobst for their assistance in the writing of th...