Friday, 30 June 2017

CORBYN, SARGON AND GLASTONBURY


Jeremy Corbyn typifies the contemporary Left. He is, if you like, the SJW's grandad. Born into an affluent middle-class family, he pretends to be the voice of the working class, like so many of his Leftist contemporaries: Ken Loach, whose premiere of I, Daniel Blake Corbyn attended, is a prime example. Of course, when these people put their fists in the air and shout about the working class, they invariably deconstruct the White working class of Great Britain, and Loach's aforementioned film, which Corbyn lauded, is a prime example, although that is for another article. The White working classes are 'soooo yesterday' and these people have moved on to the minority groups displacing and abusing Britain's indigenous working class. Unfortunately, those same native workers—and voters—seem largely not to have noticed.

Corbyn is an interesting case study: over the past few months, he seems to have been developing himself into a British Bernie Sanders. Far from being deluded in his rhetoric that often suggests he actually won the General Election, he is pushing an idea—the idea that the democratic vote only matters when the extreme Left wins. It is an idea that has been pushed by SJWs on university campuses all over the Western World. And make no mistake, his election campaign, which saw the Labour Party resurgent, was aimed at young SJWs and their pet ethnic minorities. Unlike former party leaders, Corbyn has been quick to get up to speed with Leftist youth culture, which is why Labour was quick on the draw in the battle of memes and why he has now taken to the stage to speak at Glastonbury.

Glastonbury is the event to be seen at for young middle-class SJWs and hipsters, and Corbyn knows it. Sargon of Akkad has done a video on Corbyn and his speech in which he dismisses both Corbyn's speech and Glastonbury, mocking both as lowbrow and aggrandising himself in the process as a liberal intellectual and alternative Reading Festival attendee. It is typical of Sargon's superficiality dressed up as intellectualism. Yes, the speech was basically an unstructured rant, into which Corbyn haphazardly threw in every politically correct agenda of the contemporary extreme Left. Ethnic minorities? Check. Immigrants? Check. LGBTJQ+? Check. Feminism? Check. Inequality? Check. Poverty? Check. Grenfell Tower? Check. And so on. (Speaking of poverty, Corbyn's family home where he grew up is pictured below.)


Yet what Sargon does not realise is that this jumble of PC words is deliberate; this is exactly what the audience wants. They want style without substance; that is why they are at the Glastonbury Festival to begin with. Corbyn's speech sounds as though it was written by a Junior Communist from the lower sixth form because that is exactly to whom he is appealing. And when I say lower sixth form, there is no difference in maturity these days between a sixteen-year-old college student and a twenty-one year old university graduate. The facts that Sargon has corrected him on, like on the Suffragettes, do not matter to these people. However, Sargon is completely incorrect about revolutions. The French Revolution was led by the same bourgeois clique as the Russian one—the difference being the Russian bourgeois clique was heavily populated by Jews, but I doubt Sargon would ever address that. In fact, in both revolutions the conservative working class was rounded upon, as happened in the Vendee after the French Revolution and the Ukraine after the Russian.

And here is the point: it is always the Corbyns that egg on the soldiers and thugs in jackbooting the proletariat. One remembers how quickly Leon Trotsky went from nerdy theorist to head of the Red Army, from ostensible democrat in the 'Social Democratic' Parties of Europe to revolutionary psychopath who ordered retreating soldiers shot during the Russian Civil War. Make no mistake, Corbyn is cut from the same cloth. Sargon recognises Corbyn's dictatorial streak, his willingness to tell everyone what they should be aspiring to and doing with their lives, but Sargon treats this as a bit of a joke; and this is the problem with classical liberals and conservatives: they have always laughed off the nonsenses of the extreme Left—even as the Left has almost gained hegemony over our culture. They have laughed at them, allowed them a platform, tried to make peace with them, seen their point of view, and ultimately given in to them. And that is one of the major reasons the likes of Sargon and, for that matter, Theresa May are mere talking heads.


The other reason is that for which Sargon constantly berates Corbyn: collectivism. Sargon's assertion that a society is made up of individuals is as silly as Corbyn's globalist utopian fantasies—and for largely the same reason. By collectivism, Sargon is referring to a cohesive group identity, yet one needs a cohesive group identity to form a society. Atomised individuals out for their own gain are not conducive to a cohesive society; there has to be a common bond whereby people work for the good of the group. The likes of Sargon cannot stand against, nor even begin to understand, something like Islam or Communism precisely because of his commitment to the failed doctrine of Whiggery. Corbyn understands this all too well, and one notes his enthusiam for Islam as much as for Communism. Communism and Islam have their similarities: both are doctrinaire, authoritarian and work towards the destruction of the West in a traditional sense.

Both are also used where there is no natural cohesion between peoples, as they stamp on the natural instincts of man to bond with those who look, think and act in a similar way, by using ideological authoritarianism and terrorism on the masses, as it is only in this way that a cohesive society of diverse peoples can be maintained. This is the real reason for mass immigration into the West. A multi-ethnic society created by mass immigration will justify one, the other, or a mixture of these doctrines. This is what contemporary Whigs like Sargon fail to understand, and in their failure to address group dynamics, as individualists, they cannot possibly stand against collectivists, because a group will always beat individuals in a fight. And this is what it will come down to.



The only solution to this is racialism, whereby one has an organic collective, as opposed to the inorganic one imposed by Islam and Communism. This does not deny individualism, for one can be an individual as part of a group in an organic society.  Indeed, the group gives the individual context for his individuality. As long as the individual thinks of both his own gain and that of the group without contradiction, both the individual and the group stand to benefit. If the individual's actions are to the detriment of the group, then the group will be weakened and potentially fall prey to other hostile collectives. This is precisely what Whiggery has brought about.

Indeed, it was interesting that Corbyn's herald was the founder and organiser of the Glastonbury Festival himself, Michael Eavis (top photo, right of Corbyn), a Methodist. Methodists had always been influential in politics, and supported the Whig/Liberal Party en masse in the late nineteenth century and, in doing so, opened their doors to socialism, as the Liberals became ever more 'progressive', the Methodists now rubbing shoulders with the Radicals. Eavis' welcoming Corbyn on stage, then, had a certain symbolism to it. Liberals have always been the gatekeepers to Communism, with their and Sargon's hero John Stuart Mill even suggesting that Communism might yet be the best form of society in his Chapters on Socialism.

The fact is that unless the political scene radically alters, Jeremy Corbyn will win the next General Election. In his mind, he has already won it. The liberalism of the contemporary Conservative Party and even UKIP (if that party manages to get its act together) cannot combat the extremism of the far Left and Islam. Between this election and next, the Radical Right has to organise and mobilise. Memes are great for attracting the younger generation online, but there has to be more in terms of real activism. This does not just mean in pure politics, but also in the cultural struggle (particularly music—watch this space), in charity work and in environmentalism. In these, we challenge the very morality of the Left—and it is easy to do so, for this was the state of the site where the Glastonbury Festival was held the day after:


Remember: the opposite of RIGHT is both LEFT and WRONG.

Originally published at Mjolnir Magazine


6 comments:

  1. I always enjoy Sargon but he is superficial. I would be surprised if Carl Benjamin aka Sargon of Akkad is very suspicious of Jewish groups.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sargon of Mossad, LOL

      Delete
  2. My comment is long but worth the careful read (as always). Due to web site limitations (4096 characters), it will be in two parts.

    I'm happy that this essay was published on the same day that numbers show Alternative Right and the alt right more broadly is FLAGGING BADLY - it's not just your site, its ACROSS THE BOARD!

    Why am I happy? I'm pro white, why would I seem to be having schadenfreude witnessing alt right troubles?

    Easy! Pro white is not synonymous with alt right. The instant the alt right shows that it will not and cannot assume the form needed for white racial advantage - I flush it.

    Has the alt right shown that? Since November 2016, it has. What has it done? It has made itself politically IRRELEVANT with things like Heil Gate, and finally politically DANGEROUS with the recent anti-Theresa May pro-Jeremy Corbyn campaign!

    Now, in the above essay, so much is wrong that I cannot go point by point to refute all the errors. Instead I will quickly summate the last few months in British politics:

    Sensing an advantage, Theresa May called a snap election. She ran TO THE RIGHT, advocating a HARDER Brexit, and WON. It was a narrow victory; sure, she could have run up the score with a more centrist campaign, but strove for something more. She had to partner with the DUP, a party similar to US Southern Conservatives. From the point of view of pro whites, all of that is a great development!

    Did May get help from the alt right? From UKIP? From Farage? Perhaps Farage and UKIP phoned it in, pulled their punches so to speak, which would be helpful. But what of the alt right? Across the board, the marquee names of the alt right (Spencer, Anglin and others) SAVAGED Theresa May. Many attacks were driven by the fact that she had banned certain individuals from visiting the UK, a sin, to be sure. Other vile attacks centered around the fact she has no children. If she wanted to have children but couldn't, such attacks would be a VILE SIN! I wish it would be that petty, but sadly it isn't.

    The real reason the alt right SAVAGED May is because the alt right is on a losing road, lead by horrible people. Their STRATEGY is to foment division amongst the right and to focus on fist fighting in the streets (what they stupidly call "meta politics") and undermine and eschew actual politics!

    Corbyn is anti-racist to the core. His alleged hostility towards the Jews is motivated by his view that Israelis are white colonialists. His politics would perhaps be FATAL to the whites in the UK in the same way the end of Apartheid has been FATAL to white Afrikaners!

    People are cheering him on? Even "Ironically"? Horrible!

    Thankfully May commands a 13 seat majority and much like the attacks on Trump make the wall 10 feet taller, the attacks on the New Iron Lady have just made Brexit 10 TIMES HARDER!

    Corbyn will have to wait 5 years for the next general election. Can he hold his Coalition of the Ascendant together? Today he just had 40% of his MPs rebel against his capitulation to a HARD Brexit - it's going to be a long 5 years for him! Like Bernie Sanders, the bloom is ALREADY off the rose!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The alt right is dead; it's been dead for a while. At first the body stunk badly, now it's been dead for so long you cannot even smell it anymore. The way forward is not through the wannabe-MILO paradigm embodied by Spencer - there is NO growth there. The way forward is through logos / arta as embodied by such rising stars as Jordan B Peterson and Survive the Jive.

    In this paradigm, Respect for Nations is but one facet of a broader platform that can actually appeal to anyone. Resisting White Genocide, a moral imperative derived from Respect for Nations, lives along side standing with workers against the machines that displace them, standing FOR civil liberties and against corporate techno-fascism, and restoring meaning and sacredness to to our lives, both now and for our posterity.

    Nietzsche wondered why people were uninterested in midwifing the Superman. He argued that all of history is a series of surpassings; do we want to be the end of that great tide? The most beautiful act of Will is midwifing the Superman!

    How wrong he was!

    It is the resistance to the great tides of history, resistance to the instinctual amorality of life that is THE SUPREME ACT OF WILL! The survival of mankind as we know it is what we should and will come together to fight for AND WE WILL WIN!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The address and crowd whipping activities of Corbyn at Glastonbury, was reminiscent of the methods adopted at the Nurenberg Rallies to create divisions and hate . Zeig Corbyn !
    Having recently watched a programme on the History Channel regarding the Nuremberg Rallies, the similarities is quite frightening. I honestly think May wanted to loose the GE , bring back fox hunting, hurt the pensioners, the large majority that was helping her?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I would like to try an explanation of the left allure because the left threatens to exterminate our race, and in order to prevent that, it needs to be addressed appropriately. So one has to ask why anybody would condone the left despite its obvious inconsistencies.

    The left is a defense alliance, and an alliance for power (i.e. first offer protection by defense, later gain and keep absolute power). So wht´s the biggest threat for any individual? The mob. A majority can overwhelm a minority and an individual. To prevent that, you need this social contract: never may any one individual or minority be threatened by the majority. Any instance of violation of this rule has to be sanctioned immediately and deterringly; and anybody who doesn´t accept this rule, is excluded, ostracised, from the community:

    that is the social contract, and the power architecture, the power arithmetics, of the left.

    It offers protection for everybody. That makes for its attractiveness. Because everybody can be the victim of the mob. Talk about the very funny "code red" actions. If they gang up against you, you´re dead. Your only chance for survival is an ironclad social contract that prohibits that.

    There is another allure: that of community. It´s of-course an absurd impertinence that the left claims "community" because "community" belongs of-course to the racial family; that only shows the viciousness of the jewish mendacity.

    So what´s the answer to all this left allure? Maybe it´s: national socialism. I.e.something similar, the safety of the group, and the social contract; but not with niggers but for us Whites, or more generally, for actual peoples that belong together.
    So how can we be inclusive, as per the social contract, and exclusive, racially? That´s not difficult, it´s only a pseudo-problem invented by the jews: Whites have not the least bit of inclination to be lumped together with niggers.
    The only difference is: people can form communities but only certain people belong to it, not the whole "mankind". I.e. there will be many communities instead of one big delusional "mankind" community: nationalism for all peoples.

    So the solution may be something like NS (and that´s probably the reason why there´s nothing more demonized on the planet than that... so that we can´t fall back on that solution).

    But the point is: we need to understand why people feel an allure of the left. Because despite all justified criticism of the left, despite all of its inherent shortcomings and absurdities, people will always say: yes, and so what? Still worth it. Advantages come at a price, and the price is woth the advantages. You have to give something to get something. They have my back, you don´t. With them, I live. With you, I die. We really need to understand this allure in order to counter their argumentation and alienate their base.

    David, you say, Corbyn will win. With the left winning, the White Race goes extinct. We must wise up and we must offer a real solution.

    ReplyDelete

PODCAST 54: ADL SENPAI NOTICES US

Following their inclusion on the ADL's list of top movers and shakers in the Alt-Right, Alternative Right Editors Andy "The N...