Saturday, 29 July 2017


The Alt Right is struggling to define itself. This is natural and healthy for a movement that got a sudden jolt when mentioned by a presidential candidate. But instead of clinging to loyalties as if they were football teams, it might make sense to look into what the Alt Right has been.

One key is found in the word “alternative.” As mentioned by those who influenced its inception and those who guided the way, the Alt Right was designed to be an alternative to both the cuckservative mainstream Right, which is more Left than anything else, and the angry malevolence of the white nationalist underground.

Instead of those narrow visions, the Alt Right aspired to an entirely new concept of what civilization could be. It started with the idea of nationalism and human biodiversity, and combined those into the knowledge that genetics creates culture. At that point, it became clear that homogeneity is a prerequisite to civilization, and after that, we need to design carefully.

This new vision swept up many of those attracted to its influences — men’s rights, libertarianism/neoreaction, monarchists, nationalists, identitarians, traditionalists, and the European New Right — and now they are different lenses through which people see the Alt Right. To a libertarian, it is mostly about freedom; to a nationalist, it is mostly about ethnic homogeneity.

What is interesting is that all of these ideas point to something that is not in the middle of them, but above them, a force that unifies them. This is the idea of the timeless form of human civilization, free from democracy and socialism, united by culture and ethnic group, driven by a desire for virtue and transcendent truth, and free of the ugliness, red tape and futility of modern civilization.

As the Alt Right reaches for that force, it is being pulled in two directions, which we have described here loosely as "cuck versus sperg":
"While the Alt Lite has done much good, namely by forcing the Left to abandon its double standard on free speech, it also misses the point: all politics is identity politics because each group represents its own interests.

We know that the Alt Right wants to navigate between cuck and sperg, or the two extremes of the Right, with “cuck” being the Leftist hybrids in the Republican party and “sperg” being the people who seem to delight in racial cruelty on the White Nationalist front. Neither is a functional model.

In fact, the Alt Right represents a third path: recognize that what the spergs talk about is part of the truth even if it is socially taboo, but that we can understand it in a logical/factual and not emotional/personal way."
These divisions, once external to the Alt Right, are now within it. The cucks want to preserve the present system with a few fixes that are justified with egalitarianism, which legitimizes the Leftist perspective because it is wholly based in egalitarianism; the spergs want to roll the dice on racial violence and dictatorship, which have never gone anywhere but bad places even when well-intended like Hitler, Mussolini, Brezhnev and arguably Napoleon were.

In this way, we can see how the cucks follow the typical middle class bourgeois paradigm: they view the world through a filter of their own success and status, and are not concerned with effects beyond that unless those impede the success of themselves as individuals. Middle classes, especially the upper half, have little loyalty to nations or governments. For them, the world is a question of how to advance their personal power and fortune.

The spergs fall into two groups. The first are honest but misguided; these are “bright sophomores,” or those with a fair amount of intelligence but little experience, and so no depth of analysis. The other half are the same old angry antisocial types who bloated white nationalist and succeeded in making it irrelevant to both decision-makers and voters.

By trying to appease both groups, the Alt Right threatens to make itself unstable. It is fine to sit on the line between cuck and reality so long as it brings over people living in the mainstream, and this has worked so far. But when it goes too far into a fight for “equality,” the Alt Right becomes as poz-converged as the Republicans.

On the same note, the spergs tend toward an egalitarian view of a different sort. They want all whites to be equal at the expense of everyone else. While it makes sense to send all Other away, social hierarchy like caste is essential, and you see very few of these who would accept being a kshatriya or thrall in service to brahmins. This leads us back to the same problems of democracy.

To look toward our future, the Alt Right should consider two vital questions:
1. Why do we have such high turnover?
Hunter Wallace describes this as it influenced white nationalism:
"First, it is depressing to comb through the archives of dead vBulletin forums – several of my own included – and see all the people who have disappeared. The vBulletin forum was an amazing tool that allowed our ideas to reach a mass audience, but it wasn’t without its flaws."
People flee social groups — which is what the Alt Right becomes, in the pidgin social framework of our society — because they believe the group is ineffective, because they tire of the same circular arguments, because other people alienate them, or because they feel they are unrecognized. It is the latter that seems most prevalent to me.

Time and time again, someone with a new take on issues or an insightful analysis shows up in the comments section of a blog, a forum or social media. They are shouted down by those who want to affirm the dogma as it stands, and the crowd gravitates toward what it already knows. Feeling like their contributions will do no good here, over time the most promising individuals leave.

It would be great to be able to say that this has improved over the years, but over the last six months, the Alt Right has experienced attrition of some of its most promising writers and commenters. Those who repeat the same old stuff in new forms are sticking around, along with some very talented people who often get far less recognition than they deserve.
2. Why do whites (or any other race) not awaken as a group?
This is the question that terrified white nationalists. Most resolved it by hypothesizing that at some point, conditions between the races would get so bad that race war would break out, and in the ensuing chaos, whites would find identity.

Let us instead look at the worst case scenario which is actually more likely: racial tension gets worse, and individualist whites escape it through white flight, which means that the people who could change the situation do not address the situation. At some point, demographic balance shifts and whites find themselves in the same position as whites in Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Detroit or Los Angeles: outvoted by the lower classes, they become tax cash cows until trace admixture turns them into people who no longer identify with being European at all, only with having slightly lighter skin and more money. This is the consistent pattern throughout history.

The only way to bridge this divide is to offer a better vision of civilization not just as regards race, but as concerns every problem of modernity: ecocide, debt, idiocracy, corruption, unnecessary war, instability, recessions, existential misery and lack of a decent place for their children to grow up. The only way to take this bull by the horns is to present a society which is more advanced than modernity, but lacking the fundamental characteristics (equality, mass culture, consumerism) of modern society.

Another factor that is important here is recognizing caste. We need a social order with aristocrats, serfs and freeholders so that we can rein in the bad instincts of our people. Most people have bad instincts for leadership, and in groups people make terrible decisions no matter how intelligent they are, so we need this caste division, which also preserves the role of the virtuous but successful among us.

We also need to recognize that there is no such thing as the white race as a political identity. There are white ethnic groups and those tend to stick together, usually at the broadest level by associating into Western, Southern and Eastern Europeans. Any movement that tries to lump these groups together as one will alienate each group, from its most perceptive at the top who are most likely to understand their own identity as complex, all the way down as people discover the need for identity other than generic “huwhite.”

Finally, we need to make it clear that we are not people hellbent on repeating the mistakes of history. We know what happened with national socialism and fascism, and despite whatever good was there, a fundamental instability was also present, as most people are now seeing in democracy. We also have seen how scapegoating and bigotry replace decision-making with a time of team violence. There is also a great and sensible fear of mass movements that empower the unsuccessful to seize power, because whether wealth redistribution or retribution, that means that the successful will become targets, and they will fight this.

Neither cucks nor spergs will acknowledge these truths, so it is important to find a middle path between. From the cucks, it makes sense to take the desire for gradual transition that keeps focus on the essentials of life before all else, and from the spergs, the notion that we cannot make the current system work at all. If we synthesize those, we can formulate a new civilization that will entice our people.

Originally published at


  1. We need Sex Studies, not Gender Studies. Sex Studies understand Race + Politics better.
    Stronger and more aggressive blacks terrorize whites but whites continue to worship blacks because blacks dominate sports, pop music, and spirituality(as MLK and Mandela are worshiped as god and messiah).
    We have this nonsense called 'gender studies' but what we really need is sex studies. Sex is biological, gender is socially constructed. It’s reality vs fantasy. Maybe, the elites promote genderology to distract us from the crucial facts of sexology.
    All white people are the products of white men planting seeds in white women. White women are like European soil. If you lose the land, you lose the place where you can build homes and plant food. It means death. Likewise, if white men lose access to white wombs, they lose the chance to make white life. For example, if any white man’s mother had been womb-colonized by a Negro, he would have been Afroborted and replaced by mulatto who will identify as black. So, control of land and wombs is vital for racial survival. Blacks control all black wombs, and now, even white wombs are coming under Afro-Colonization.
    Why? Because blacks are more muscular and more aggressive. They also have bigger genitals, now a common trope in Pop Culture, even prime-time TV shows. Also, sports and music are related to sex. Female instinct wants to mate with top warriors, even those of another race that defeats her own race. Female instinct despises the loser, even of her own race.
    When whites integrate with blacks, blacks routinely kick white butt in schools, streets, and sports fields. Blacks command the ball, white girls play cheerleader for them. Look at Sports Illustrated. Top athletes are black, top bikini models are white.
    Also, music and sex affect same parts of the brain. As blacks have louder voices and more rhythm, they make more lustful music, and this turns white women into jungle women.
    Now, manhood is vital for male psychology, health, and survival. The fact is white manhood wilts and fades in the presence of blacks. White Manhood needs safe space from Black Thughood. White Manhood and Black Manhood cannot co-exist. When two come together, blacks are coc*s, whites are cucks. It’s like in prisons where black inmates routinely rape white boys as their ‘bit*hes’.
    Milo, Andrew Sullivan, and other ‘gay conservatives’ are bitches to black homo genitals.
    So, why should white males welcome(than resist) the massive invasion of Europe by blacks. If a bunch of Vietnamese come to France, French manhood can lord over Viet manhood because Viet men are short and geeky. But when Sub-Saharan Africans arrive, French manhood goes down the toilet. Black males intimidate French males, win in sports, sing rap, and conquer French wombs. Same in UK.


    1. What kind of man wants to lose his manhood in his own homeland and lose his women to Africans who conquer and colonize white wombs like Spanish conquered and colonized New World indigenous wombs and created the servile mestizo race that still lives under Hispanic rule?
      According to PC, the Ideal White Fatherhood is welcoming black Africa invasion so that stronger blacks will beat up a white man's sons and impregnate his daughters. Yes, white fathers should cheer the impregnation of their daughters’ wombs by the same black studs or thugs who beat up their white sons and robbed them of manhood.
      What kind of white man would want tougher blacks to beat up his sons and impregnate his daughters? But PC says that is the IDEAL white parenting.
      We need Sex Studies about the real power and real survival. We don’t need Gender Studies that distract us with fantasies and encourage white boys to seek out 50 alternate genders of wussidom.
      In the global scale, Africa is the Penis, Europe is the Vagina. When those two worlds collide and co-mingle, black men dominate white men and use white wombs to make black babies.(But things are different between Europe and Asia. When those two worlds meet, Europe is the penis, and Asia is the vagina. European colonize Asian wombs.)
      By global standards, Africa is penis, Asia is vagina.
      Europa is somewhere in between. It is vagina to Africa, penis to Asia.
      White women go to Africa for sex with men,
      White men go to Asia for sex with women.
      Globalist Sexuality isn't about colorblind union of the world. It means sexual colonization of some races by others. So, African men colonize white and Asian wombs. (Most mulattos are products of black men taking white women, and virtually all 'Blasians' are products of African men conquering Asian women. As Asian men have no global sex value, they now look forward to sex robots.)

  2. Mostly I see trailer-trash level white woman with black guys.

    Sure you have the odd celebrity pairing, but if you go to the mall the white chicks you see with blacks tend to be fat slobs. Woman's desire for a man to take care of them exceeds even their interest in dating the hot guy. Hot guys, including negro athletes get dates in high school, less in college, and then what.

    No one really cares how great you are at basketball (unless you are an NBA player) after age 23, when your college days are done. Now lower class whites who are not headed to college and don't have enough intelligence to avoid pregnancy in their teens and early 20s do, indeed, sometimes get knocked up by black guys.

    The vast majority of white woman, like white men, are of average or greater intelligence, and have a tendency towards low time preference. The MGTOW criticism of woman riding the cock-carousel, and indulging in their genders tendency to hypergamy strikes me as much more of an actual threat to white fertility than the blg black cocks you go on endlessly about.

    Successful college educated white woman don't want to mate with low-status blacks with limited earning power just because they dance better and their dong is an inch longer. The do want to land a CEO potential guy, and a lot of them end up played and used when they hit the wall.

    Continuing to expose woman to things like the concepts of MGTOW, their own tendencies towards hypergamy and the risk they face of hitting the wall are all useful to start changing social dynamics. I think blacks have little chance of rising high enough in social status to become attractive to most white (or Asian) women. But yes, there will always be some mud sharks out there.

    1. Women usually prefer affluent men. These are rarely black men.

  3. As for the concept that we need castes, that has proven destructive in the societies that have implemented it. Look at India, it became quite weak and dysfunctional under the caste system, and now that it is quickly rising from the depths of the 3rd world the caste system is fading out.

    European aristocracy, likewise, were simply not effective beyond a few generations and by the time you got to the Age of Revolution they were also physically degenerate in many cases, with odd hereditary illnesses.

    Societies that allow an entire class to subsist on the legacy of their ancestors never end up as well as those that don't. The Chinese mandarin system, where standardized tests were the gateway to gaining entrance to the class of civil servants, who were essentially the aristocracy, probably worked better.

    Some combination that allows both parents to leave a legacy to kids, but still encourages those kids to do something even greater is the ideal. Some families seem to instill this in their kids, but East Coast prep schools are full of the American aristocracy, and many of them do act like the Kennedy kids: drugged out, always vacationing, vacuous, until eventually they kill themselves playing football on skis, crashing an airplane they are not trained to pilot properly, or merely shooting up too much smack at their dealers house.

  4. If this is supposed to be an argument for monarchy, just come out and say it. Monarchy & inherited nobility is a shitty way to run a nation.

    The alt-right is not in a crisis of identity. Our goal is the same now as it ever was: increase white identity and shift the Overton window such that white identity can be openly talked about. What happens next is debatable and to a large extent out of our hands, but we should hammer out some possible reactions to the many possible future scenarios.

  5. I thought so too. But as per much of the leadership and also the commentators the Alt Right doesn't imply racialism necessarily. Or even solidarity with one's own kindred. Many of them, like the very people they claim to hate- the neo-cons and many on the Left-, are of them are Eugenicists, rather. Hence the schizophrenic mixed messaging all over the Alt-Rightosphere and New Right.

    The strong, or in some cases, overarching emphasis placed on things like castes. The Social Class of the "elite" trumps race and kin in thier minds. Like globalists and commies as well. Economic classes matter to them. Materialism or education as a proof of high status and nobility. This is scientifically laid out in many books they like. Status. Sex. IQ. r and k selection. and much talk of "aytrans" That's "Nobility".which includes non-Europeans and even non-whites- of particular classes. and the elevation and fascination with East Asians and Ashkenazim and thier elevation over the 'lower" whites. Also gender issues and the idea propagated constantly all over the Alt- rightosphere that white women are the lowest form of humanity and That any man of any race is higher than any white woman. Who must be constantly gamed and manipulated and triggerd. The ultimate cucks to bring non-white men to write anit-white female articles.

    Many are not white men writing these articles. They are jewish, or some other non-white or some weird versions of Leftists. or they work for same. or are mixed- ethnics. Or married to others. Including the very last people you would ever expect. Many are definitely not pro-white at all. Not even a little bit. They have other agendas they are pursuing within the Alt-Right.

    so no. it's not about white identity or solidarity. for that there are better places.

    1. so, the Alt-Right about "ideas"- not race. some are good. some are not.

    2. I have nothing against Monarchy or royal families or whatever or its concept. It serves as a time honored tradition and vital security in many parts of the world. Including Japan ( the oldest continuous Monarchy- dating back to 660 BC) and many European countries and Britain and Canada. If I was a committed Monarchist i would have my choice of counties to go to.
      but for Americans - it is not only cucky =- but also spergy- not mention full blown traitor.

    3. The Monarch of the Alt-Rightosphere is King Momus.

  6. nice this blog.
    You put really very helpful information. Keep it up. Keep blogging. I’m looking to reading your next post.


  7. During the twenty-first century economic growth in the United States has slowed to a crawl. What growth has happened has gone to capital rather than labor, and to the salaries of those who were already the best paid Americans.

    If most Americans conclude that hard work will not earn for them a rising standard of living, I predict they will decide to use political and governmental efforts to achieve economic redistribution. This redistribution may take one of two forms.

    The white majority may decide to economically, and perhaps politically, disenfranchise non whites, and perhaps Jews. The rise of the alt right and the presidency of Donald Trump represent that possibility.

    Alternatively, the overall majority of Americans of all races may decide to raise taxes on the rich and spread the wealth around. The candidacy of Bernie Sanders, who was always ahead of Donald Trump in the polls, represents that possibility, as does the growing popularity of socialism in the United States.

    The growing practice and approval of inter racial dating and marriage, especially among the young, indicate that racial consciousness is declining in the United States.

    At any rate, the side that wins will be the side that has the best leaders and the most compelling messages.



by Colin Liddell AUDIO VERSION AVAILABLE HERE In recent days, the news cycle has been dominated by so-called "racism" ...